No Frackin' Way

Nuclear power is one thing*, but Frackin' with our water?

* not green(except for trickle up)
[What the frack is the connection to Newt Gingrich, well the paradox of green and being able to be a paradox period. His frackin' campaign seems to be burning the candle on both ends. But this is too complex for me to explain, except for the idea that he commits to Lean Six Sigma,*** but not to the concepts his staff thinks it will take to win. Is this a bringing it to the table moment ala the silver lining of the churned media cloud? It is bad enough that Republicans have enough money to run their lies in ads and Faux News, but they have enough to add cloud to the process.]
[Not to** mention lame stream media.]

** way
*** last frackin' link

[Post comments footnote(see my two comments): There is nothing wrong with Six Sigma as a tool, but it may be besides the point, but not aside from the point of whose hands it is in, and for what purpose it is wielded(people or profit). In fact, I believe that "Lean Six Sigma" violates "Six Sigma" principles by having a target of 25% spending reduction, which demonstrates my point on purposes and whose hands should wield it for what. Aside from the point: what the frack is the point of government?]

11-30-11

Update 11-30-11
Adjusted Bottom Link to reflect previous day's post.

Also noting that November 2011 archive is not large enough to contain all the posts for November. As if Tin Foil Herman was not a big enough post... here are the preceding posts.
11-7-11 Sat-Ire[!]
11-6-11 Star Chamber Revisited
11-3-11 Two Points
11-2-11 Cain Un-Able
11-1-11 Hyper-Sorting
11-1-11 Six Sigma
11-17-11* It's not Rocket Science

My intent above was to list the earliest posts for November. Six Sigma is not Rocket Science, but navigating our nation, just may be, let alone this blog. Bottom Line? Anachronism is in play.

* anachronism explained: bottom link of each post is supposed to indicate the previous post. Six Sigma has 11-17-11 as that link. But apparently 10-31-11 may be more complex an anachronism-
If Only It Were Black and White
Axis of Fruit Loops
Update

Romney Seal Team Six Sigma'd Himself.

In the third and final Presidential debate * , Romney flipped his Seal Team Six Sigma on his own Rhetorical Been Laden. 

* (continued 10-23-12)

























For some (retro) reason...

10-24-12
Lean Manage Mean't? [!]
Kudos to in-eff-able!
It takes three points to make a plane. 
Three dimentions to make a field[!].   



SIX SIGMA

SUMS IT UP.
No pun on Zero Sum***, or Raj Patal.
[posted 11-17-11]
Or Sigma(n) Freu d.*

On the other hand, it may depend on whose hand[!]

* not exactly sticking to new 4 mat

** game
Gingrich may be the card.

Zero #Roman#(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l, em,nop a d o p e.)

Sic Sigma? Revisited. And how(the heck) I got here.
It is not about points on a curve, but where (the bleep R we) the heck we are going.
[update labels]
[A Ginrich Typo originally appeared in this piece.]

FOOTNOTES MARCH 2013

3-14-13 : interesting digs Six Links
(b.s.) "S.E.(vi)" A. (fn)FOR D... , B. i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy , C. ROW MAN #Sign [Numeral (i)]. 
(b.s.) "Six Sigma" A. No Frackin' Way (sc) ... E. Rocket Man?[!] ... I. Over Helming. (sc).
un M bed Ed (sc) ?[!] {?}

3-18-13:  Not to leave it, or pun on SNL: nor love it.  R we LOL in the same boat? As for Heading
*: dimentionalism(sic) -
lede : (b.s.)tetra+heed+run - A.,B.,C.,D.,G.,H.,I.
or : (b.s.) lede+or+ship - A., ... . N. Walking the Plank[!] (s.c.)
ship : (b.s.) share+n+angle -
? : (b.s.) tetrahedron of will -
focus : (b.s.) Hume  A. Third Times a Charm. B. He said *a fowl*!
on :  (b.s.) Hume+or+us  / Humorism
Pythagorean : Pythagorean - A Place to Ponder
Socratic :  Socratics. - (b.s.)Kant+Hegel
published today 3-18-13

3-20-13 Curve Balls?  (b.s.)Curve+Balls: A., B., C., D. /  Original Intent and Spin.

3-22-13  Scroll over, and only "Physics" had been read at time of post. Post Physics? / Un Try
Angles? 

3-28-13 Absolut(ist)ly - "clothing" (b.s.)robin+hood: RawMoney Runnin', Genre Clash (sc),  Fair and Balanced... (sc) / divide**: At what point is (pun and rap on justice/scales and founding docs) / "absolutist"(b.s.)absolutism : At what point is , Primary Boogeyman.  / win or lose (b.s.)former(pop+culture): A.(sc), B., C., D., E., F., G., Slash Segue(sc), The Billy Club...(sc), A generous dia-Gnosis.(sc).,  FAUX CULTIAN? (sc), Close Enough for(sc),  Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em, M(m)., N(n), Pluto, Plato, and the Pen Dull'em, P., Q.(q).  latter (b.s.)boogeyman: Primary Boogeyman, B., C., Bottom Line Update(sc), Juxta-Boogey (sc)
VFW:Virtue Freedom War?  Rhetoric, Logic, Grammar ? [!]

Rocket Man?[!]

 

...OFF ?

 

The irony or Mittstory is in the geometrics, and might be the in-f-able [!] 

The launch pad is another matter but it takes 3 points to make a plane, and this is a blank 'f 'n odd footnote.  But stinking to the story or retro-jets, this is the 4th post-note or footnote*. 

 

 * anachronism may be moved/adjusted later

[The point for now is that I am behind on the follow-up in the area of the first three posts for this month.  And then after the last bulky post and plan to asterisk or footnote, found that those original 3 had many of the images I had just 4-matted un-a-knew[!] Now that is the ticket.  Almost.

a. I Ron Knee Chef

b. In the Beginning

c. REFRAIN is a Heckuva Paradocs[!]

d. A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the News Stand ouch

e. Calm Pend E Um

f. Total eclipse of the

g. 4A? FOOTNOTES: SEPTEMBER 2012

h. Catch-22?

i. In the Mean Time...

j. (anomoly^ of al gore rhythm and heading?)

k.

l.

m.

n.

Oh and the reality is that things change, not that they are right in the first or next place, but for now I think I have logged the links correctly if not as planned.

2-point-oh... and "lables"la not LGF for now. 

 

^ (b.s.)= blog search 4 (sic)+pun and at this time includes "a." thru "n." which will off** course change with time if not also algorithms of BlogSpot beyond my understanding.  But one anomoly of that sort appears just as I switched 4mat between "i." and "j.", not that I did not trigger something I just don't know why I chose to save some time and effort if not meaning and the "headings" switched from being self-linked to prior linked, upon scrolling over them.  In the Mean Time...  ...  SIX SIGMA .  And I better stop now before who knows what. 

 

** not to make dark of the light (but that was a typo... I ...THINK.)

 

Q ED ?

Stardate: 10.18.12.9.53pdt

 

[Update: under construction or*** 4Mat review.]

*** i.e. footnotes re:GPS'n. Countdown to Current?(dot/dot/dot)

Actually I am burying a link. Best Wishes4Fishes.  And Beyond(TimAllen)Bu'hhhh-Dump-ump[!]

 

 

Add End Um

[Posted on 12-15-11]
The November Archives are apparently full. Not to pun on it, not to mention anachronism*.
Here are the missing links.
11-1-11 SIX SIGMA
11-1-11 Hyper Sorting
(scroll over or click on)
11-2-11
11-3-11
11-6-11
11-7-11
11-9-11
11-10-11
11-10-11
just in case

*bottom links should be link to most recent post

It is hard to say Herman means anything literally.

Or actually?

He did not say "I'm a leader not a reader",
nor did the Schwarzenegger.
It is about lede'er ship[!]

[11-21-11: As "A Wonder..." is held in draft, I am processing a Revolution. Speaking of Calm Cast, I didn't mean to forcast.]
[As for weather[!], recent Republican interference in presidential foreign policy* is dangerous** stuff, and further muddles the mess age and message. I don't know if anyone can ever be a Nixon to China after this administration, or a Cain to business.]

* recent event references not noted in link
** a,b
[note: [!] = (sic)or sarcasm/irony Also "A Wonder..." under construction.]
[Segue: good for?(sic?) NOT!]
[Just to be clear*** I am not opposed to six sigma or cuts, but there is a food chain, or some hierarchy which is bubble up. Incidentally, it is a lot like the cycle of life and climate change. The segue or root here is the cost effectiveness, not trickle down. Money is not the root of all evil, nor is any tool or process, necessarily.]

*** the NOT! is not fully read yet(NFRY)
[Speaking of not read yet, the point is in the lede, or prelede. It is easier to debunk, than bunker up. MORNING MESSAGE: America's Affluent and the New Bunker Down, literally(!?)]

Way[!]

Not Exactly [!] (Sarcasm aside !)
[Important to reads: Doing What Works, not Lean Six Sigma, but* Try Angles!]

*also Taleb link (too update)

[Earlier con/text

Over Helming.

[6-24-11 The lack of pomp and need for circumstance*(or circumdecision?)
President Obama on the Way Forward in Afghanistan(video)
Just an aftergoogle. But I will add that Randi Rhodes gave an impressive perspective on the President's remarks, not necessarily here, but it is reflected a bit in the video of the Democrats bringing it home.]

Please note the navigational metaphor in Professor John Kay's interview in the context of Professor Ha-Joon Chang's interview and the Bib Leo File of Republic Cons.
Inter-Dimentionalism and Ge Oh Metricks not so aside: The 6Sigma of Newt needs a pinnacle of purpose. i.e. there truly needs to be a navigational approach. Not akin to "rocket science"**, but having an aim and the model to chart it. My point is that 6 Sigma does not have a point, or rather a point is needed a priori for it to work. Actually it is not about the 6 edges of a tetrahedron, but the break down of the bell curve. If it were only about the bell curve it might have a point. My point is that politics has a point of balancing power and processing the point. But from a freedom perspective is that a goal? But from a navigational perspective there is a need for a 3D grid plus time and processing. The six edges of a tetradedron reflect the 4D dynamics of the process, that is not the goal. The goal is out there, the dream or unrealized principles if you will. The balance or base is the Try Angle*** and dynamics of Physics, Psychology and Philosophy(also processes as well as subjects) for realizing our balance of powers and dreams.

* an after link: NY Times from Randi Rhodes Blog
(also TPM)
** after bolds(4) in original post
*** pun on 3 points determine a plane(and tripod) but a 4th point determines 3 dimensions. Not to mention the Geo of Risk and Robustness of Nassim Taleb. He must not be taken out of context. Reducing debt does not mean reducing spending and economics is not the most efficient determinant. "(nature) it seems very inefficient for an economist but it is robust"(...)"I want society...to be more robust and more open to up side." My only point is that society(politics see "science" bold following "rocket") has a place in determining the rules that provide the circumstances.]